Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the auxiliary role of resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) in the clinical diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using machine learning techniques. Methods: Resting-state EEG recordings were obtained from 57 children, comprising 28 typically developing children and 29 children diagnosed with ADHD. The EEG signal data from both groups were analyzed. To ensure analytical accuracy, artifacts and noise in the EEG signals were removed using the EEGLAB toolbox within the MATLAB environment. Following preprocessing, a comparative analysis was conducted using various ensemble learning algorithms, including AdaBoost, GBM, LightGBM, RF, XGB, and CatBoost. Model performance was systematically evaluated and optimized, validating the superior efficacy of ensemble learning approaches in identifying ADHD. Conclusion: Applying machine learning techniques to extract features from resting-state EEG signals enabled the development of effective ensemble learning models. Differential entropy and energy features across multiple frequency bands proved particularly valuable for these models. This approach significantly enhances the detection rate of ADHD in children, demonstrating high diagnostic efficacy and sensitivity, and providing a promising tool for clinical application.
References
[1] Weigard A, McCurry KL, Shapiro Z, et al., 2023, Generalizable Prediction of Childhood ADHD Symptoms from Neurocognitive Testing and Youth Characteristics. Transl Psychiatry, 13(1): 225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-023-02502-6
[2] Brandt V, Kerner Auch Koerner J, Palmer-Cooper E, 2019, The Association of Non-obscene Socially Inappropriate Behavior With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms, Conduct Problems, and Risky Decision Making in a Large Sample of Adolescents. Front Psychiatry, 10: 660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00660
[3] Rosenthal EA, Broos HC, Timpano KR, et al., 2024, Does Emotion-Related Impulsivity Relate to Specific ADHD Symptom Dimensions, and Do the Effects Generalize Across Comorbid Internalizing and Externalizing Syndromes? J Atten Disord, 28(2): 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547231210283
[4] Mahone EM, Denckla MB, 2017, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Historical Neuropsychological Perspective. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 23(9–10): 916–929. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617717000807
[5] Loe IM, Feldman HM, 2007, Academic and Educational Outcomes of Children with ADHD. J Pediatr Psychol, 32(6): 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsl054
[6] Emser TS, Johnston BA, Steele JD, et al., 2018, Assessing ADHD Symptoms in Children and Adults: Evaluating the Role of Objective Measures. Behav Brain Funct, 14(1): 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12993-018-0143-x
[7] Chen H, Yang Y, Odisho D, et al., 2023, Can Biomarkers be Used to Diagnose Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder? Front Psychiatry, 14: 1026616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1026616
[8] McCabe GA, Smith MM, Widiger TA, 2023, Psychopathy and Antisocial Personality Disorder in the Fifth Edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: An Attempted Replication of Wygant et al. (2016). Personal Disord, 14(6): 636–648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1026616
[9] Poirion OB, Jing Z, Chaudhary K, et al., 2021, DeepProg: An Ensemble of Deep-Learning and Machine-Learning Models for Prognosis Prediction Using Multi-Omics Data. Genome Med, 13(1): 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-021-00930-x
[10] Zhao M, Ye N, 2024, High-Dimensional Ensemble Learning Classification: An Ensemble Learning Classification Algorithm Based on High-Dimensional Feature Space Reconstruction. Applied Sciences, 14(5): 1956. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051956
[11] Liu ZP, Gao R, 2018, Detecting Pathway Biomarkers of Diabetic Progression with Differential Entropy. J Biomed Inform, 82: 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.05.006
[12] Shi LC, Jiao YY, Lu BL, 2013, Differential Entropy Feature for EEG-Based Vigilance Estimation. 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 6627–6630. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6611075
[13] Garbaczewski P, 2006, Differential Entropy and Dynamics of Uncertainty. Journal of Statistical Physics, 123(2): 315–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-006-9058-2
[14] Daubechies I, 1990, The Wavelet Transform, Time-Frequency Localization and Signal Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 36(5): 961–1005. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.57199
[15] Pan Y, Zhang L, Wu X, et al., 2019, Structural Health Monitoring and Assessment Using Wavelet Packet Energy Spectrum. Safety Science, 120(3): 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.015
[16] He H, Chen Y, Lan B, 2021, Damage Assessment for Structure Subjected to Earthquake Using Wavelet Packet Decomposition and Time-Varying Frequency. Structures, 34(12): 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.087