A Comparative Study of Transvaginal Sonography and Pelvic MRI in Patients with Endometrial Cancer
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Endometrial cancer
Myometrial invasion
Pelvic MRI
Transvaginal sonography

DOI

10.26689/jcnr.v6i2.3575

Submitted : 2022-01-19
Accepted : 2022-02-03
Published : 2022-02-18

Abstract

Background: The most prevalent type of gynecological cancer is endometrial cancer. Accurate surgical staging is the most important aspect in the management of endometrial cancer. Preoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion and appropriate management could be achieved by transvaginal sonography and pelvic MRI. Methods: A total of 53 patients with endometrial cancer, who were referred to a gynecology oncology department of an academic hospital in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences from 2018 to 2020, were evaluated in this study. Data were collected using a questionnaire on endometrial cancer. All the patients underwent preoperative transvaginal sonography and pelvic MRI to evaluate myometrial invasion. The involvement of myometrium thickness and histological findings were compared between two imaging modalities, and SPSS 23.0 was used to analyze the data. Results: Junctional irregularity was the most prevalent finding on transvaginal sonography. Based on transvaginal sonography, myometrial invasion of less than 50% was found in 73% of patients, while invasion of more than 50% was observed in 26.31%. In 57.44% of MRIs, there was less than 50% myometrial invasion, while in 42.55% of MRIs, there was more than 50% myometrial invasion. In both modalities, the most common finding was myometrial invasion of less than 50%. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of transvaginal sonography were 0.47, 0.27, and 0.75, respectively, whereas the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of MRI were 0.54, 0.45, and 0.61, respectively. Conclusion: MRI can be the modality of choice for evaluating myometrial invasion and optimizing endometrial cancer treatment planning, as well as reducing the complications of non-indicated lymphadenectomy.

References

Guerriero S, Saba L, Pascual MA, et al., 2018, Transvaginal Ultrasound Vs Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 51(5): 586-595.

O’Malley R, Dighe MK, 2014, Invited Commentary on American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Endometrial Carcinoma. Ultrasound Quarterly, 30(1): 29-31.

Tarney CM, Wang G, Bateman NW, et al., 2019, Biomarker Panel for Early Detection of Endometrial Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 221(5): 472.

Lalwani N, Dubinsky T, Javitt MC, et al., 2014, ACR Appropriateness Criteria Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Endometrial Cancer. Ultrasound Quarterly, 30(1): 21-28.

Corrado G, Calagna G, Cutillo G, et al., 2018, The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Cosmetic Outcomes of the Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 28(1): 194-199.

Miklos P, Klacko M, Babala P, et al., 2014, Transvaginal Ultrasound Examination of Myometrial Infiltration by Endometrial Cancer. Bratisl Lek Listy, 115(1): 14-18.

Zamani F, Goodarzi S, Hallaji F, et al., 2012, Diagnostic Value of Pelvic MRI for Assessment of the Depth of Myometrial Invasion and Cervical Involvement in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of New Versus Old FIGO Staging. Iran J Radiol, 9(4): 202-208.

Aryan A, Askari F, Mohammadifar M, et al., 2016, Role of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) in Preoperative Staging of Endometrial Cancer: A Review. Austin J Radiol, 3(1): 1045.

Crispens M, 2016, Endometrial Cancer, in Rock J, Jones H, Telinde’s Operative Gynecology, 10th Edition, Wolters & Kluwer, Philadelphia, 1290-1295.

Anciaux D, Lawrence W, 1997, Malignant Uterine Tumors: An overview, in Shingleton H, Fowler W, Jordan J et al., Gynecology Oncology: Current Diagnosis and Treatment, 1st Edition, Saunders, Philadelphia, 130-143.

Shrivastava S, Barmon D, Kataki AC, et al., 2016, Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pre-Operative Staging of Endometrial Cancer. Indian J Cancer, 53(1): 181-185.

Pineda L, Alcázar JL, Caparros M, et al., 2016, Agreement between Preoperative Transvaginal Ultrasound and Intraoperative Macroscopic Examination for Assessing Myometrial Infiltration in Low-Risk Endometrioid Carcinoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 47(3): 369-373.

Alcázar JL, Orozco R, Martinez-Astorquiza CT, et al., 2015, Transvaginal Ultrasound for Preoperative Assessment of Myometrial Invasion in Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 46(4): 405-413.

Jiang J, Zhao JL, Qing JF, et al., 2018, Endometrial Carcinoma: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation with Ki-67 Expression. Clinical Radiology, 73(4): 413.

Arthur RS, Kabat GC, Kim MY, et al., 2019, Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Endometrial Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: a Prospective Study. Cancer Causes & Control, 30(4): 355-363. DOIL 10.1007/s10552-019-01139-5

Singh N, Hirschowitz L, Zaino R, et al., 2019, Pathologic Prognostic Factors in Endometrial Carcinoma (Other Than Tumor Type and Grade). Int J Gynecol Pathol, 38 Suppl 1(1 Suppl 1): S93-S113.

Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, et al., 2019, Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin, 69(5): 363-385.

Gallego JC, Porta A, Pardo MC, et al., 2014, Evaluation of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance and Intraoperative Frozen Sections. Abdom Imaging, 39(5): 1021-1026.

Lee YJ, Moon MH, Sung CK, et al., 2016, MR Assessment of Myometrial Invasion in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Discrepancy between T2-Weighted Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY), 41(1): 127-135.

Sundar S, Balega J, Crosbie E, et al., 2017, BGCS Uterine Cancer Guidelines: Recommendations for Practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 213: 71-97.

Savelli L, Testa AC, Mabrouk M, et al., 2012, A Prospective Blinded Comparison of the Accuracy of Transvaginal Sonography and Frozen Section in the Assessment of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 124(3): 549-552.

Alcazar JL, 2017, Transvaginal Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Assessment of Myometrial Infiltration in Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gynecol Oncol, 28(6): e86.

Du L, Lei Y, Li D, et al., 2012, Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma According to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) Staging Criteria. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao, 32(7): 1048-1051.

Mohamed DM, El-Wahab abo Dewan KA, Mera SM, 2018, The Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion Weighted Image in Female Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma. Alexandria Journal of Medicine, 2018: 685-691. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajme.2018.10.002