Translating Core Legal and Business Term Families in Chinese-English Legal and Regulatory Texts: A Clause-Level Corpus-Based Study
Download PDF

Keywords

legal translation
business-legal terminology
official bilingual legal and regulatory texts
corpus-based study
clause function
Skopos theory

DOI

10.26689/tpccc.v1i1.15708

Published : 2026-02-26

Abstract

This article examines the translation of core legal-business term families in official bilingual legal and regulatory texts issued by China’s Ministry of Commerce and its affiliated official channels. Combining a corpus-based approach with a clause-sensitive analytical framework, it takes the term token as the primary unit of analysis and the clause or provision as the auxiliary unit. The study focuses on four concept families—liability, breach, termination, and indemnity—and evaluates how they are rendered across different legal-functional environments, especially obligation or prohibition clauses (OBL) and limitation or exemption of liability clauses (LIM). The completed coded dataset contains 218 tokens drawn from a parallel corpus of authoritative Chinese legal-regulatory texts and their official English reference versions. The results show that literal translation (LT) is the dominant strategy in the corpus, followed by normative modulation (NM), while free translation (FT), communicative restructuring (CR), and mixed FT + CR occur far less frequently. At the clause-function level, OBL clauses are strongly LT-dominant, whereas LIM clauses display a more mixed profile in which LT, NM, and FT all remain salient. The article supplements the descriptive counts with representative qualitative examples in order to clarify how strategy labels are operationalized in context. The findings suggest that, in this corpus, translators rely primarily on direct lexical correspondence and conventionalized legal-administrative formulations, with freer reformulation used selectively in functionally sensitive contexts. The article argues that legal accuracy in this corpus is achieved mainly through stable terminological transfer and normative conventionalization rather than through extensive adaptive reformulation, while also stressing that the results remain descriptive and corpus-specific.

References

Šarčević S, 1997, New Approach to Legal Translation. Kluwer Law International.

Cao D, 2007, Translating Law. Multilingual Matters.

Nord C, 2018, Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Prieto Ramos F, 2021, Translating legal terminology and phraseology: Between inter-systemic incongruity and multilingual harmonization. Perspectives, 29(2): 175-183.

Biel Ł, 2014, Phraseology in legal translation: A corpus-based analysis of textual mapping in EU law. In Cheng L, Sin KK, Wagner A (Eds.), The Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation (pp. 177-192). Farnham: Ashgate.

Goźdź-Roszkowski S, Pontrandolfo G, 2015, Legal phraseology today: Corpus-based applications across legal languages and genres. Fachsprache, 37(3-4): 130-138.

Goźdź-Roszkowski S, 2021, Corpus linguistics in legal discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 34(5): 1515-1540.

An J, Sun J, 2022, Translation strategy of legal terms with Chinese characteristics in Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China based on Skopos theory. PLOS ONE, 17(9): e0273944.

Cohen J, 1960, A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1): 37-46.

Krippendorff K, 2004, Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3): 411-433.

Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, 2009, Measures for the Administration of Prohibited and Restricted Import of Technologies. visited on January 20, 2026, https://english.mofcom.gov.cn/Policies/LawsRegulations/art/2013/art_c7118d36de79483a9112e2dff63ef358.html

Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, 2020, MOFCOM Order No. 4 of 2020 on Provisions on the Unreliable Entity List. visited on January 20, 2026, https://english.mofcom.gov.cn/Policies/GeneralPolicies/art/2020/art_1889a24134054b5b841134c3fba44654.html

Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, 2021, MOFCOM Order No. 1 of 2021 on Rules on Counteracting Unjustified Extra-territorial Application of Foreign Legislation and Other Measures. visited on January 20, 2026, https://english.mofcom.gov.cn/Policies/GeneralPolicies/art/2021/art_98677d0ed28b41b9adeff27b00c9d001.html

Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, 2020, MOFCOM Order No. 3 of 2020 on Rules on Handling Complaints of Foreign-Invested Enterprises. visited on January 20, 2026, https://english.mofcom.gov.cn/Policies/AnnouncementsOrders/art/2020/art_f51a8baf43b54dc2af247c62d447224d.html