Background: Labor analgesia nursing is an important component of intrapartum care, involving pain management, maternal experience, and health outcomes. However, the knowledge structure, research hotspots, and emerging trends in this field have not been systematically explored. This study aimed to analyze the current status, hotspots, and frontiers of labor analgesia nursing research using bibliometric methods. Methods: Relevant publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection using the search strategy TS = ((“labor analgesia” OR “labor pain relief” OR “obstetric analgesia”) AND (nursing OR midwifery OR “intrapartum care”)). The time span was from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2025, and the search was conducted on March 1, 2026. After screening, 72 eligible publications were included. CiteSpace 6.4.R1 was used to analyze annual publication trends, collaboration networks of authors, institutions, and countries/regions, as well as keyword co-occurrence, clustering, and burst patterns. Results: The annual number of publications showed an overall upward trend and reached a peak in 2025. The United States occupied the central position in the country/region collaboration network, whereas collaboration among authors and institutions remained relatively scattered. Lim, Grace, was the most prominent author, and the Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education was the leading institution. High-frequency keywords mainly included epidural analgesia, fentanyl, labor analgesia, anesthesia, obstetric analgesia, cesarean delivery, nitrous oxide, and bupivacaine. Keyword clustering indicated that the field mainly focused on analgesic drugs, analgesic techniques, obstetric outcomes, and related clinical research topics. Recent burst keywords included health, childbirth satisfaction, obstetric analgesia, and labor. Conclusions: Labor analgesia nursing research has expanded steadily over the past two decades. Current studies mainly focus on pharmacological analgesia, obstetric outcomes, and maternal experience, while recent frontiers emphasize health outcomes and childbirth satisfaction.
Halliday L, Nelson S, Kearns R, 2022, Epidural Analgesia in Labor: A Narrative Review. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 159(2): 356–364.
Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, et al., 2012, Pain Management for Women in Labor: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(3): CD009234.
Thomson G, Feeley C, Hall Moran V, et al., 2019, Women’s Experiences of Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Pain Relief Methods for Labor and Childbirth: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Reproductive Health, 16(1): 71.
Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Cyna A, Cuthbert A, 2018, Epidural Versus Non-Epidural or No Analgesia for Pain Management in Labor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5(5): CD000331.
Zuarez-Easton S, Shalev E, Salim R, et al., 2023, Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Options for Pain Relief During Labor: An Expert Review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 228(5S): S1246–S1259.
Ingram M, Pratt K, Bull C, 2022, The Barriers to Offering Non-Pharmacological Pain Management as an Initial Option for Laboring Women: A Review of the Literature. European Journal of Midwifery, 6: 37.
Vargens O, Silva A, Progianti J, 2013, Non-Invasive Nursing Technologies for Pain Relief During Childbirth—The Brazilian Nurse Midwives’ View. Midwifery, 29(11): e99–e106.
Smith A, Laflamme E, Komanecky C, 2021, Pain Management in Labor. American Family Physician, 103(6): 355–364.
Synnestvedt M, Chen C, Holmes J, 2005, CiteSpace II: Visualization and Knowledge Discovery in Bibliographic Databases. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2005: 724–728.
World Health Organization, 2018, WHO Recommendations: Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. Geneva: World Health Organization.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, 2019, ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209: Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(3): e208–e225.
Wang T, Sun S, Huang S, 2017, Effects of Epidural Labor Analgesia with Low Concentrations of Local Anesthetics on Obstetric Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 124(5): 1571–1580.
Chaillet N, Belaid L, Crochetière C, et al., 2014, Nonpharmacologic Approaches for Pain Management During Labor Compared with Usual Care: A Meta-Analysis. Birth, 41(2): 122–137.
Bohren M, Hofmeyr G, Sakala C, et al., 2017, Continuous Support for Women During Childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7(7): CD003766.
Broughton K, Clark A, Ray A, 2020, Nitrous Oxide for Labor Analgesia: What We Know to Date. Ochsner Journal, 20(4): 419–421.
Richardson M, Lopez B, Baysinger C, et al., 2017, Nitrous Oxide During Labor: Maternal Satisfaction Does Not Depend Exclusively on Analgesic Effectiveness. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 124(2): 548–553.
Hodnett E, 2002, Pain and Women’s Satisfaction with the Experience of Childbirth: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186(5 Suppl Nature): S160–S172.
Taheri M, Takian A, Taghizadeh Z, et al., 2018, Creating a Positive Perception of Childbirth Experience: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prenatal and Intrapartum Interventions. Reproductive Health, 15(1): 73.
Urbanová E, Škodová Z, Bašková M, 2021, The Association Between Birth Satisfaction and the Risk of Postpartum Depression. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19): 10458.
Ugarph Edfeldt M, Gustavsson H, Hildén K, et al., 2025, Pharmacological Pain Relief and Women’s Birth Experience: A Systematic Review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 25(1): 505.
Lim G, Carvalho B, George R, et al., 2025, Consensus Statement on Pain Management for Pregnant Patients With Opioid Use Disorder From the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S0002-9378(24)01183-9.
Sriram S, Almutairi F, Albadrani M, 2024, Midwife-Led Versus Obstetrician-Led Perinatal Care for Low-Risk Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1.4 Million Pregnancies. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(22): 6629.