Objective: To summarize the clinical data and nursing experience of 5 cases of pregnant women with combined heart disease in pregnancy after cesarean section, followed by termination of pregnancy and then cardiac surgery in the postoperative period, to provide clinical experience for the care of such patients in the future. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the treatment and nursing process of 5 cases of pregnant women with pregnancy-related heart disease admitted to the hospital’s department from May 16, 2023, to September 19, 2024, after cesarean section for termination of pregnancy, followed by cardiac surgery. For postoperative patients after cesarean section, using the “waist bag” type sandbag hemostasis method to prevent intra-abdominal pressure poly drop caused by heart rate, blood pressure abnormal treatment, and hemostatic effect, reduces the frequency of hemostatic drugs [1]. Strict monitoring of vital signs and hemodynamic monitoring, to maintain access and stability of the internal environment, digestive system care. Result: Five pregnant women with heart disease who underwent surgery all recovered and were discharged after appropriate nursing measures were taken. The average length of hospital stay for the five patients was (20 ± 14.3) days. Conclusion: For pregnant women with complicated heart disease who undergo cesarean section to terminate pregnancy followed by cardiac surgery, it is essential to strengthen specialized monitoring and clearly define key observation points. Focused treatment and nursing care can help reduce postoperative complications, support patient recovery and self-care, and shorten hospital stays. This approach provides valuable clinical guidance for managing similar cases in the future. It is of clinical significance for future cardiac surgery after cesarean section in pregnant women with complicated heart disease.
Ao S, 2013, The Effect of Sandbag Pressurization of the Uterine Fundus on Women After Cesarean Section. Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology: A Middle-aged Journal, 22(4): 1.
Lu Z, Qi H, 2020, Interpretation of “Management Guidelines for Pregnancy Complicated with Heart Disease (2019)” by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency Care Electronic Edition, 9(3): 9.
Liu Z, Dai Q, Wang M, et al., 2014, Correlation Between Ultrasound Parameters of Cesarean Section Scar Pregnancy and Intraoperative Blood Loss. Chinese Journal of Hua Liang, 5(1): 7.
Shi H, Ge Y, Bao H, et al., 2009, A Comparative Study of Three Methods of Measuring Cardiac Volume Load and Hemodynamics. Biomedical Engineering and Clinics, 13(6): 8.
Chen X, 2011, Common Causes and Management Measures of Heparin Resistance During Cardiac Extracorporeal Circulation Surgery. Chinese Practical Journal of Medicine, 38(22): 2.
Zeng W, 2000, Modern Concept of Indication for Cesarean Section. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 16(5): 3.
Ma Q, Zhou G, Cheng H, 2011, Observation on the Therapeutic Effect of Uterine Cavity Water Bag Compression in Treating Uterine Contraction Insufficiency–Induced Postpartum Hemorrhage in 56 Cases. Journal of Jilin Medicine, 32(28): 3.
Zhang XQ, 2007, The Efficacy of Sandbags Placed Under Pressure in Abdominal Incision on Wound Healing of the Abdominal Wall in Cesarean Delivery. Journal of Xiangnan College: Medical Edition, 9(3): 2.
Yang YF, 2016, Nursing Care of Patients With Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis Complicating Cesarean Delivery. China Medical Guide, 14(35): 1.