Keywords
Routine blood test
Accuracy
Submitted : 2025-04-02
Accepted : 2025-04-17
Published : 2025-05-02
Abstract
Objective: To explore the accuracy and stability of the results of peripheral blood routine tests at different time points after anticoagulation and standing, providing a scientific basis for actual clinical work. Methods: In this study, 30 patients who visited the hospital in October 2023 were randomly selected and divided into two groups (15 cases in each group). The same collection method was used for routine blood tests. The tests were performed after anticoagulation and standing for 5 minutes, 1 hour, and 5 minutes, 2 hours respectively, and the routine blood test indicators at different time points were compared. Results: After comparison, there were no significant differences in the results of routine blood tests at 5 minutes after mixing, anticoagulating, and standing peripheral blood and those at 1 hour and 2 hours (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The results of peripheral blood after mixing, anticoagulating, and standing for 5 minutes are stable compared with those after standing for 1 hour and 2 hours. In actual work, the pre-test turnaround time can be appropriately extended.
References
Jin Y, Lu J, Jin H, et al., 2018, Reference Intervals for Biochemical, Hemostatic and Hematological Parameters in Healthy Chinese Women During Early and Late Pregnancy. Clin Chem Lab Med, 56(6): 973–979.
Serafin A, Malinowski M, Prazmowska-Wilanowska A, 2020, Blood Volume and Pain Perception During Finger Prick Capillary Blood Sampling: Are All Safety Lancets Equal. Postgrad Med, 132(3): 288–295.
Han Z, He J, Xie X, et al., 2021, Investigation and Analysis on the Application of Peripheral Blood Specimens for Routine Blood Testing by Laboratory Physicians. Ann Palliat Med, 10(9): 9516–9522.
Cui Z, Cao W, 2023, Influence of Blood Sample Collection Site and Post-Collection Testing Time on the Results of Routine Blood Tests. Guide of China Medicine, 21(08): 122–124.
Grevsen AK, Hviid C, Hansen AK, et al., 2021, Platelet Count and Function in Umbilical Cord Blood Versus Peripheral Blood in Term Neonates. Platelets, 32(5): 626–632.
Kim N, Kim TY, Han JY, et al., 2023, Five Years’ Experience with Gene Panel Sequencing in Hereditary Hemolytic Anemia Screened by Routine Peripheral Blood Smear Examination. Diagnostics (Basel), 13(4): 770.
Huang L, Fang J, Wu J, et al., 2018, Prognostic Value of Combining Preoperative Serum Tumor Markers and Peripheral Blood Routine Indexes in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Chinese Journal of Intestinal Surgery, 21(12): 1421–1426.
Keesler DA, St Martin A, Bonfim C, et al., 2018, Bone Marrow versus Peripheral Blood from Unrelated Donors for Children and Adolescents with Acute Leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 24(12): 2487–2492.
Chen J, Wang Y, Hong M, et al., 2024, Application of Peripheral Blood Routine Parameters in the Diagnosis of Influenza and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Virol J, 21(1): 162.
Stichova J, Nechvatalova J, Litzman J, et al., 2021, Possibilities for the Analysis of Peripheral Blood B Cell Subpopulations in a Routine Immunological Laboratory. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol, 70(4): 264–280.
Zhao X, Qin H, Chen W, et al., 2023, Analysis and Clinical Significance of Peripheral Blood Routine Changes of Platelet Donors with Ultra-High Frequency Donation. Transfus Apher Sci, 62(2): 103604.
Asma A, Anissa S, Touhami K, 2020, Aggregation Kinetic and Temperature Optimum of an EDTA-Dependent Pseudothrombocytopenia. Clin Chem Lab Med, 59(1): e31–e33.
Chen WJ, Du H, Hu HF, et al., 2024, Levels of Peripheral Blood Routine, Biochemical and Coagulation Parameters in Patients with Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome and Their Relationship with Prognosis: An Observational Cohort Study. BMC Infect Dis, 24(1): 75.
Gao F, Yang P, Lin Q, et al., 2018, Analysis of the Pre-Test Turnaround Time in Clinical Departments. Modern Medicine & Health, 34(24): 3763–3765.
Li X, Zhang J, Chen X, et al., 2017, Investigation and Analysis of the Total Turnaround Time of Adult Routine Blood Test Specimens in Our Hospital. China Modern Medicine, 24(15): 129–131 + 135.