Application of International Advanced Concepts in Elderly Care Services and Implications for China
Download PDF

Keywords

Aging
Elderly care services
International experience
Community-based elderly care
Long-term care insurance
Social security

DOI

10.26689/ijgpn.v3iSpecial.13915

Submitted : 2026-01-25
Accepted : 2026-02-09
Published : 2026-02-24

Abstract

Against the backdrop of accelerating global population aging, China faces multiple challenges in its traditional elderly care models, including uneven resource distribution and a shortage of professional personnel. This study analyzes international elderly care practices such as the UK’s community-based care, the US’s PACE model, and Singapore’s Central Provident Fund system, summarizing their institutional designs and operational features. Three key implications for China are proposed: strengthen the government’s leading role to promote equitable access to basic elderly care services; mobilize social forces to diversify service supply; and explore a “social-commercial insurance” mechanism to ensure the stable operation of long-term care insurance. The study aims to provide references for building a sustainable elderly care service system.

References

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2023, World Population Ageing 2023: Challenges and Opportunities of Population Ageing in the Least Developed Countries, viewed October 24, 2025, https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/launch-World-Population-Ageing-2023

Foebel AD, van Hout HP, van der Roest HG, et al., 2015, Quality of Care in European Home Care Programs Using the Second Generation interRAI Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs). BMC Geriatrics, 15: 148.

Leichsenring K, 2004, Developing Integrated Health and Social Care Services for Older Persons in Europe. International Journal of Integrated Care, 4.

Wysocki A, Thomas KS, Mor V, 2015, Functional Improvement Among Short-Stay Nursing Home Residents in the MDS 3.0. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16(6): 470–474.

Schweppenstedde D, Hinrichs S, Ogbu U, et al., 2014, Regulating Quality and Safety of Health and Social Care: International Experiences. Rand Health Quarterly, 4(1): 1.