Keywords
Wiltse approach
Thoracolumbar fractures
Submitted : 2024-01-21
Accepted : 2024-02-05
Published : 2024-02-20
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the curative effect of two minimally invasive techniques for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: 37 patients with type A fractures without neurological deficits were selected and divided into two groups. Among them, 18 patients received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF group), and 19 patients were treated using a mini-open Wiltse approach with pedicle screw fixation (WPSF group). The clinical outcomes, surgery-related results, and radiological findings were compared between the two groups. Results: The length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative hospitalization time, satisfaction, visual analog score (VAS), and Cobb’s angle between the two groups showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). However, the operation time and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy of the WPSF group were significantly lower than those of the PPSF group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Both minimally invasive techniques are effective for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures. Nevertheless, the mini-open Wiltse approach has lower radiation exposure and a shorter learning curve compared with PPSF. A larger sample, multi-center randomized controlled study is necessary to prove the clinical effectiveness of the Wiltse approach.
References
Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al., 1968, The Paraspinal Sacrospinalis-Splitting Approach to the Lumbar Spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 50(5): 919–926.
Magerl FP, 1984, Stabilization of the Lower Thoracic and Lumbar Spine with External Skeletal Fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984(189): 125–141.
Pannu CD, Farooque K, Sharma V, et al., 2019, Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeries for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures of the Spine: A Systematic Review. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2019(10): S147–S155.
Guiroy A, Sícoli A, Masanés NG, et al., 2018, How to Perform the Wiltse Posterolateral Spinal Approach: Technical Note. Surg Neurol Int, 9(38): 1–4.
Philippe CY, Fahed Z, Cesar V, et al., 2012, Minimally Invasive Posterior Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures. New Trends to Decrease Muscle Damage. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2012(22): 1–7.
Kramer M, Katzmaier P, Eisele R, et al., 2001, Surface Electromyography-Verified Muscular Damage Associated with the Open Dorsal Approach to the Lumbar Spine. Eur Spine J, 10(5): 414–420.
Assaker R, 2004, Minimal Access Spinal Technologies: State-Of-The-Art, Indications, and Techniques. Jt Bone Spine Rev du Rhum, 71(6): 459–469.
Phan K, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ, 2015, Percutaneous Versus Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015(135): 85–92.
Tian F, Tu LY, Gu WF, et al., 2018, Percutaneous Versus Open Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 97(41): e12535.
Sun XY, Zhang XN, Hai Y, 2017, Percutaneous Versus Traditional and Paraspinal Posterior Open Approaches for Treating Thoracolumbar Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit: A Meta-Analysis. Eur Spine J, 26(5): 1418–1431.
Ueda M, Hirose T, Ikuma H, 2023, A Novel Insertion Technique of Cervical Pedicle Screw (CPS) with Guidewire Under the Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Fluoroscopic Navigation System. Journal of Spine Research, 14(1): 38–44.
Wang S, Duan C, Yang H, et al., 2022, Wiltse Approach Versus Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion for Unstable Thoracolumbar Fracture with Intervertebral Disc Lesions. Orthop Surg, 14(4): 694–703.
Chang J, Cao J, Huang Z, et al., 2020, Comparison of the Modified Wiltse’s Approach with Spinal Minimally Invasive System and Traditional Approach for the Therapy of Thoracolumbar Fracture. J Biomed Res, 34(5): 379–386.
Li Y, Du Y, Ji A, et al., 2021, The Clinical Effect of Manual Reduction Combined with Internal Fixation Through Wiltse Paraspinal Approach in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture. Orthop Surg, 13(8): 2206.
Lightsey HM, Pisano AJ, Striano BM, et al., 2022, ALIF Versus TLIF for L5–S1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: ALIF Demonstrates Superior Segmental and Regional Radiographic Outcomes and Clinical Improvements Across More Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Domains. Spine, 2022(11): 47.
Schmid R, Lindtner RA, Lill M, et al., 2012, Combined Posteroanterior Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured, 43(4): 475–479.
Yang SL, Liu XY, Ma R, et al., 2021, Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Conjunction with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation via the Wiltse Approach. Orthop Surg, 13(4): 1181–1190.
Street JT, Glennie RA, Dea N, et al., 2016, A Comparison of the Wiltse Versus Midline Approaches in Degenerative Lumbar Spine Conditions. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine SPI, 25(3): 332–338.
Jin YM, Chen Q, Chen CY, et al., 2021, Clinical Research and Technique Note of TLIF by Wiltse Approach for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar. Orthop Surg, 13(5): 1628–1638.
Zhou C, Tian YH, Zheng YP, et al., 2016, Mini-Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Through Wiltse Approach to Treating Lumbar Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis. Orthop Surg, 8(1): 44–50.
Uluta? M, Yald?z C, Seçer M, et al., 2015, Comparison of Wiltse and Classical Methods in Surgery of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 49(4): 251–257.
Terai H, Tamai K, Takahashi S, et al., 2021, Clinical Comparison of Combined Cortical Bone Trajectory and Transarticular Surface Screw Versus Standard Pedicle Screw Insertion by Wiltse Approach for L5 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis. Clin Spine Surg, 34(10): E580–E587.
Matur AV, Palmisciano P, Duah HO, et al., 2023, Robotic and Navigated Pedicle Screws Are Safer and More Accurate than Fluoroscopic Freehand Screws: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Spine Journal, 23(2): 197–208.
Ran B, Yan L, Cai L, 2015, Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of the Wiltse and Traditional Posterior Midline Approaches in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Diseases. Journal of Central South University (Medical Edition), 40(1): 90–101.
Liu J, Pang Z, Xu W, et al., 2017, Comparison of Pedicle Fixation by the Wiltse Approach and the Conventional Posterior Open Approach for Thoracolumbar Fractures, Using MnRI, Histological and Electrophysiological Analyses of the Multifidus Muscle. Eur Spine J, 26(5): 1506–1514.
Gagliardi M, Guiroy A, Molina FF, et al., 2017, Trajectory of Lumbar and Sacral Pedicular Screws: Comparison Between Midline Versus Wiltse Approach. Surg Neurol Int, 2017(8): S18–S24.
Fan Y, Zhang J, He X, et al., 2017, A Comparison of the Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation and the Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures. Med Sci Monit, 2017(23): 5515–5521.
Sheng W, Jiang H, Hong C, et al., 2022, Comparison of Outcome Between Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation and the Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation for Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Retrospective Study. J Orthop Sci, 27(3): 594–599.
Lu YJ, Miao YM, Zhu TF, et al., 2021, Comparison of the Wiltse Approach and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Under O-Arm Navigation for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures. Orthop Surg, 13(5): 1618–1627.
Li H, Yang L, Xie H, et al., 2015, Surgical Outcomes of Mini-Open Wiltse Approach and Conventional Open Approach in Patients with Single-Segment Thoracolumbar Fractures Without Neurologic Injury. J Biomed Res, 29(1): 76–82.