This review examines research on Chinese–English structural–cognitive mismatch in second and foreign language learning. Although previous studies have documented key structural contrasts—such as parataxis versus hypotaxis, topic- versus subject-prominence, and differences in tense–aspect systems—these features are often analyzed independently of the sociocognitive orientations underlying their use. Synthesizing studies from applied linguistics, second language acquisition, and intercultural communication, the review identifies three dominant research strands: structurally focused accounts with limited cognitive explanation; cognitively oriented studies weakly anchored in linguistic structure; and emerging sociocognitive approaches that seek integration but remain methodologically fragmented. The review further reveals a persistent imbalance in research attention, with a strong focus on Chinese learners of English and far fewer studies on English learners of Chinese. This unidirectional orientation constrains theoretical interpretation and obscures symmetrical patterns of structural–cognitive adaptation. To address these limitations, the review argues for a bidirectional sociocognitive framework in which linguistic structure is understood as the external manifestation of culturally shaped cognition. It concludes by outlining key principles for future research aimed at developing a more integrated and explanatory account of Chinese–English language learning.
Tsai PS, 2023, An Error Analysis on Tense and Aspect Shifts in Students’ Chinese–English Translation. SAGE Open, 13(1): 1–13.
Zhou C, Dewaele JM, Ochs CM, et al., 2021, The Role of Language and Cultural Engagement in Emotional Fit with Culture: An Experiment Comparing Chinese–English Bilinguals to British and Chinese Monolinguals. Affective Science, 2: 128–141.
Purpuri S, Mulatti C, Filippi R, et al., 2024, Inside the “Feeling Different” Experience of Bicultural Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 15: 1376076.
Song D, 2024, Community-Based and Formal Chinese Language Education in Urban California, 50 Years After Lau v. Nichols. Language Policy, 23(4): 439–459.
Li Y, 2024, Chinese Learners of English Are Conceptually Blind to Temporal Differences Conveyed by Tense. Language Learning, 74(1): 184–217.
Huang S, 2024, Does Syntactic Complexity Change in English-Medium Instruction? A Longitudinal Study of EMI Lectures in a Chinese University. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 63(3): 2101–2121.
Sung YT, 2024, A Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Syntactic Complexity in Chinese Academic Writing. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1–23.
Wang Y, Xu J, 2024, The Semantics of Unknown Words with the Help of Contextual and Intentional Cues: Evidence from a Behavioral Experiment Online. Frontiers in Psychology, 15: 1358603.
Chan J, 2022, Learning and Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language: A Scoping Review. Review of Education, 10(3): e3370.
Li Y, 2022, Development of Syntactic Complexity in Chinese University Students’ L2 Argumentative Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 56: 101099.
Zhou J, Lü C, 2022, Enhancing Syntactic Complexity in L2 Chinese Writing: Effects of Form-Focused Instruction on the Chinese Topic Chain. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 843789.
Thoma D, Wiedmann T, Schacht A, 2024, Language-Dependent Emotions in Heritage and Second Language Speakers: Evidence from Automatic and Self-Reported Measures. International Journal of Bilingualism, 28(3): 374–389.
Kim H, Ro E, 2024, Usage-Based Approaches to Assessing Syntactic Sophistication in Second Language Writing: Interaction of Genre and Proficiency. Journal of Second Language Writing, 65: 101131.
Riemenschneider A, Abdi Tabari M, 2024, The Interplay of Task Characteristics, Linguistic Complexity, and Writing Performance in High-Stakes EFL Examinations. TESOL Quarterly, 58(2): 775–801.
Zou Y, He L, Chen J, 2024, Influence of Task Complexity on Text Features and Writing Performance in L2 English. SAGE Open, 14(3): 12.
Wang Z, Zhang Y, Liu H, 2022, Dynamic Development of Syntactic Complexity in Second Language Writing: A Case Study of a Young Chinese EFL Learner. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 974481.
Kyle K, Crossley S, 2017, Assessing Syntactic Sophistication in L2 Writing: A Usage-Based Approach. Language Testing, 34(4): 513–535.
Au T K, 1983, Chinese and English Counterfactuals: The Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis Revisited. Cognition, 15(1–3): 155–187.
Boroditsky L, 2001, Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1): 1–22.
Chen SX, Bond MH, 2010, Two Languages, Two Personalities? Examining Language Effects on the Expression of Personality in a Bilingual Context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11): 1514–1528.
Benet-Martínez V, Haritatos J, 2005, Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73(4): 1015–1050.
Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, et al., 2001, Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytic Cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2): 291–310.