Both Cathay Biotech and Genomatica in the United States utilize synthetic biology routes to produce long-chain dicarboxylic acids, sharing similar technological approaches. However, the two companies differ in their accounting treatment of R&D expenditures regarding capitalization and in the assessment mechanisms for government subsidies. These differences have, to a certain extent, led the two enterprises to choose distinct R&D models. From the perspective of innovation performance, Cathay Biotech’s autonomous vertical integration innovation model outperforms Genomatica’s open collaboration innovation model in terms of shortening the trial-and-error cycle and improving product gross profit margins.
Chesbrough H, 2003, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Massachusetts.
Lin H, Zeng S, Chen Y, et al., 2024, Absorptive Capacity in Open Innovation: The Role of External Knowledge Diversity. Journal of International Business Studies, 55(1): 123–145.
Barney J, 1991, Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.
Wang S, Moore G, 2024, Knowledge Protection in the Open Resource-Based View: Identity, Boundaries, and Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 39(2): 215–238.
Cathay Industrial Biotech’s Prospectus, 2020, Cathay Industrial Biotech’s Prospectus (July 2020). Cathay Industrial Biotech.
Genomatica, 2026, Crunchbase Funding Database, visited on January 12, 2026, https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/genomatica.