https://ojs.bbwpublisher.com/index.php/PAR/issue/feedProceedings of Anticancer Research2025-05-29T15:41:54+08:00Seven Gaoinfo@bbwpublisher.comOpen Journal Systems<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Proceedings of Anticancer Research (PAR) </em>is an international peer-reviewed and open access journal, which is devoted to the rapid publication of high-quality original articles, reviews, case reports, short communication and letters on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The covered topics include, but are not limited to: cellular research and bio-markers, identification of bio-targets and agents with novel mechanisms of action, preventative and integrated treatments for cancer patients, radiation and surgery, palliative care, patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, and anticancer medicine, anticancer agents, novel therapies in development, cancer management, biomarkers, diagnostics, clinical trials, treatment guidelines.</p> <p align="justify"> </p>https://ojs.bbwpublisher.com/index.php/PAR/article/view/10570Application of Proteomic and Metabolomic Technologies in Renal Cell Carcinoma and Research Progress of Related Biomarkers2025-05-29T15:41:48+08:00Liyuan Zhangteam@bbwpublisher.comJunyan Liteam@bbwpublisher.comYoufu Panteam@bbwpublisher.com<p>Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which accounts for about 90 percent of kidney cancers, has a distinct metabolic reprogramming profile characterized by increased aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect), abnormal accumulation of lipids, and impaired mitochondrial function. Recent advances in high-throughput proteomic and metabolomic technologies have revolutionized our understanding of the pathophysiology of RCC, allowing for the systematic identification of disease-specific molecular signatures, elucidation of drug resistance mechanisms, and possible targets for intervention. The review focuses on the use of proteomic and metabolomic technologies in renal cell carcinoma and the research progress on related biomarkers, and is expected to provide useful information for the early detection and treatment of RCC.</p>2025-05-29T10:35:14+08:00Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)https://ojs.bbwpublisher.com/index.php/PAR/article/view/10571LINC00936 Suppresses Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Progression Through Modulation of the Ras/MAPK Signaling Pathway2025-05-29T15:41:50+08:00Yang Chenteam@bbwpublisher.comLin Duteam@bbwpublisher.com<p><em>Objective</em>: To characterize the tumor-suppressive role of <em>LINC00936 </em>in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through mechanistic exploration of its regulatory pathways. <em>Methods</em>: Bioinformatics interrogation of TCGA/NSCLC cohorts assessed <em>LINC00936 </em>expression, clinical correlations, and immune contexture. Functional enrichment analyses predicted pathway associations. In H1299 cells, <em>LINC00936 </em>overexpression (plasmid) and knockdown (siRNA) models were validated by RT-qPCR. Transcriptomic profiling identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) subjected to KEGG pathway analysis. <em>Results</em>: <em>LINC00936</em> was significantly downregulated in NSCLC tissues (TCGA, <em>P</em> < 0.05) and cell lines (vs. 16-HBE, <em>P</em> < 0.05), correlating with poor prognosis and altered tumor-infiltrating immune subsets. DEG enrichment implicated Ras/MAPK signaling as the dominant pathway (FDR < 0.05). Successful <em>LINC00936 </em>modulation (overexpression/knockdown, <em>P</em> < 0.05) confirmed its regulatory capacity. <em>Conclusion</em>: <em>LINC00936 </em>acts as a tumor suppressor in NSCLC via Ras/MAPK pathway modulation, proposing its therapeutic candidacy for precision oncology strategies.</p>2025-05-29T00:00:00+08:00Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)https://ojs.bbwpublisher.com/index.php/PAR/article/view/9631Risk Assessment Models for Venous Thromboembolism in Gynecological Patients: A Review of Current Practices and Future Directions2025-05-29T15:41:46+08:00Yue Zhaoteam@bbwpublisher.comJie Jiaoteam@bbwpublisher.comHuizhi Lanteam@bbwpublisher.comBoya Liteam@bbwpublisher.comYinglan Liteam@bbwpublisher.comXiumin Zhangteam@bbwpublisher.comLijuan Mateam@bbwpublisher.com<p>This article introduces and compares risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in gynecological patients at home and abroad. The models assessed included the Caprini risk assessment model, the G-Caprini risk assessment model, the Rogers risk assessment model, the Autar risk assessment model, the gynecological patient surgical venous thrombosis risk assessment scale, the Wells score, the COMPASS-CAT thrombus risk assessment model, the Khorana risk assessment model, the Padua risk assessment model, and the Chaoyang model. The purpose of this study is to provide a foundation for developing a risk assessment tool for gynecological venous thromboembolism tailored to Chinese patients and to assist clinical health care workers in selecting appropriate risk assessment tools and guiding individualized prevention measures.</p>2025-05-29T10:54:25+08:00Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)https://ojs.bbwpublisher.com/index.php/PAR/article/view/10525Observation on the Effect of Interventional Therapy Combined with Lenvatinib and Sintilimab in the Treatment of Advanced Liver Cancer2025-05-29T15:41:43+08:00Yana Gaoteam@bbwpublisher.comJiao Heteam@bbwpublisher.comQiliang Xuteam@bbwpublisher.com<p><em>Objective</em>: To observe the control effect of interventional therapy combined with lenvatinib and sintilimab in patients with intermediate and advanced liver cancer. <em>Methods</em>: 82 patients with intermediate and advanced liver cancer who visited from January 2022 to January 2025 were selected as samples and randomly divided into two groups. Group A received interventional therapy combined with lenvatinib and sintilimab, while Group B received interventional therapy combined with lenvatinib. Disease remission rate, adverse reactions, liver function indicators, and tumor marker indicators were compared between the two groups. <em>Results</em>: The disease control rate (DCR) in Group A was higher than that in Group B (<em>P </em>< 0.05). There was no difference in adverse reaction rates between Group A and Group B (<em>P </em>> 0.05). Total bilirubin (TBil), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in Group A were lower than those in Group B (<em>P </em>< 0.05). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and alpha-L-fucosidase (AFU) levels in Group A were also lower than those in Group B (<em>P </em>< 0.05). <em>Conclusion</em>: Intermediate and advanced liver cancer patients receiving interventional therapy combined with lenvatinib and sintilimab showed reduced tumor marker levels, lessened liver function damage, and a high disease control rate and treatment safety.</p>2025-05-29T11:03:13+08:00Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)https://ojs.bbwpublisher.com/index.php/PAR/article/view/10542Study on the Efficacy and Quality of Life Impact of Combination Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Epirubicin and Docetaxel for Breast Cancer Patients after Radical Mastectomy2025-05-29T15:41:54+08:00Ting Zhaoteam@bbwpublisher.comXiaoyan Yangteam@bbwpublisher.comYi Shenteam@bbwpublisher.comDiantai Zhangteam@bbwpublisher.comYuxin Meiteam@bbwpublisher.comGuodong Shenteam@bbwpublisher.com<p><em>Objective</em>: To explore and analyze the clinical effect of combination adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and docetaxel for patients after radical mastectomy for breast cancer. <em>Methods</em>: This study enrolled 60 patients between May 2022 and December 2024, who were randomly allocated into two equal treatment groups (<em>n </em>= 30 each). The control group received standard chemotherapy, whereas the observation group was treated with a combined adjuvant regimen of epirubicin and docetaxel. Therapeutic outcomes were systematically compared between the groups. <em>Results</em>: The comparative analysis of chemotherapy regimens revealed significant intergroup differences in multiple outcome measures. The observation group demonstrated superior clinical efficacy (96.67% vs 80.00%, <em>P </em>< 0.05) alongside a more favorable safety profile (adverse reaction incidence: 3.33% vs 20.00%, <em>P </em>< 0.05). Metabolic assessments showed better glycemic control in the observation group, with both fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels being significantly lower than controls (<em>P </em>< 0.05), while maintaining comparable values to pretreatment baselines (<em>P </em>> 0.05). Furthermore, quality of life assessments indicated significantly better outcomes in the observation group compared to controls (<em>P </em>< 0.05). <em>Conclusion</em>: The combination of epirubicin and docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients after radical mastectomy for breast cancer has significant clinical effects, can improve patients’ quality of life, and has high safety. It is worthy of adoption.</p>2025-05-29T00:00:00+08:00Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)