The Efficacy and Safety of Radical Surgery Combined with Modified Cervical Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of Oral Cancer
Download PDF

Keywords

Radical surgery for oral cancer
Modified neck lymph node dissection
Oral cancer
Oral function
Prognosis

DOI

10.26689/par.v10i2.14537

Submitted : 2026-03-15
Accepted : 2026-03-30
Published : 2026-04-14

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of radical surgery combined with modified neck lymph node dissection in the treatment of oral cancer. Methods: A retrospective selection was made of 80 patients with oral cancer treated in the Department of Stomatology at Yichang Central People’s Hospital from January 2020 to January 2022. According to differences in treatment plans, all patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 40 cases in each group: the control group underwent radical surgery for oral cancer, while the observation group received radical surgery combined with modified neck lymph node dissection. Surgical outcomes, VAS scores, oral function, and prognosis were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results: There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, VAS scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, oral function scores in all three dimensions were higher in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05); the 3-year metastasis rate was lower in the observation group, while the survival rate was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Radical surgery combined with modified neck lymph node dissection is significantly effective in treating oral cancer. It markedly relieves postoperative pain, improves oral function, reduces metastasis rates, and increases survival rates.

References

Xue L, Guo Y, 2024, Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Oral Cancer. Chinese Clinical Oncology, 51(19): 988–992.

Qiu S, Li Y, Liu F, 2024, Standardized Treatment of Oral Cancer Under the Guidance of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oncology of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network in the United States. West China Journal of Stomatology, 42(5): 566–571.

Zhong Z, Guo W, 2025, Influencing Factors of Infection in Patients After Radical Resection of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. China Minkang Medicine, 37(18): 18–20 + 27.

An W, Mai M, Yao Z, 2020, Evaluation and Analysis of the Prognosis of Two Types of Cervical Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma cN1. Xinjiang Medicine, 50(4): 319–321.

Xie Y, Zheng J, Hong J, et al., 2022, Radical Resection of Oral Cancer Analysis of the Effect of Modified Cervical Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of Oral Cancer. Systematic Medicine, 7(7): 174–177.

Meng N, Wang X, Fang Z, et al., 2021, Effects of Modified and Traditional Scapulohyoid Supracervical Lymph Node Dissection on the Efficacy and Prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients. Journal of Practical Cancer, 36(4): 590–593.

Zheng X, Zhang J, Gu F, 2025, Correlation Between Intraoperative Pathological Assessment and Prognosis of Neck Lymph Node Dissection in Oral Cancer. Journal of Practical Cancer, 40(4): 598–602.

Cui J, Zhang J, Wang M, 2022, The Effect of Scapulohyoid Muscle Supracervical Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of cN0N1 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma on the Quality of Life of Patients After Surgery. Journal of Practical Cancer, 37(1): 130–132.

Wang R, Wu Y, Yan C, et al., 2025, Research on the Application of Shoulder and Neck Functional Exercise Program in Elderly Patients with Cervical Lymph Node Dissection of Oral Cancer. Geriatric Medicine and Health Care, 31(3): 804–808.

Wang J, Li Y, Zhang X, et al., 2025, Evaluation of the Effect of “Internet” Telerehabilitation Based on Four-Dimensional Innovation Model on Shoulder and Neck Rehabilitation in Patients After Cervical Lymph Node Dissection in Oral Cancer Selective Areas. Chinese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 23(4): 369–376.