Keywords
Open fistulotomy
Efficacy
Submitted : 2024-12-04
Accepted : 2024-12-19
Published : 2025-01-03
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the treatment effect of open fistulotomy on patients with anal fistula. Methods: A total of 42 patients with anal fistula who visited the hospital from March 2021 to March 2024 were selected as samples and grouped using a random number table. The observation group received open fistulotomy, while the control group received conventional treatment. The differences in efficacy, surgical indicators, inflammatory factors, pain scores, and complications were compared. Results: The cure rate of patients with anal fistula in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the infection rate and recurrence rate were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The surgical operation time, wound healing time, and hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the observation group and the control group (P > 0.05). The interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The complication rate of patients with anal fistula in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Open fistulotomy for the treatment of patients with anal fistula can reduce inflammatory reactions, optimize surgical indicators, reduce pain, and is safe and efficient.
References
Lian C, Chen X, Tang X, 2021, Analysis of the Effectiveness of Open Fistula Excision in the Treatment of Anal Fistula Patients and Its Impact on Complications. Chinese Community Doctors, 37(14): 63–64.
Wang M, Wang G, 2017, Interpretation of the 2016 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Guidelines for the Treatment of Perianal Abscess, Anal Fistula, and Rectovaginal Fistula. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2017(2): 71–74.
Liu J, 2022, Analysis of the Application Value of Open Fistula Excision in the Surgical Treatment of Anal Fistula. Chinese Scientific Journal Database (Full Text) Medicine and Health, 2022(5): 5–8.
Chen P, 2023, The Effect of Intersphincteric Fistula Ligation Combined with Fistula Tunnel Resection in the Treatment of Low Anal Fistula Patients. China Minkang Medicine, 35(22): 60–62.
Feng J, 2021, Observation on the Therapeutic Effect of Open Fistula Resection in the Treatment of 75 Cases of Anal Fistula. Chinese Journal of Anorectal Diseases, 41(12): 26–27.
Xie Y, Chen M, Ding X, et al., 2022, Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Internal Ostium Catheter Drainage Combined with Open Fistula Resection in the Treatment of Anal Fistula. Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application, 16(14): 64–66.
Yi Y, 2021, Observation on the Clinical Efficacy of Open Fistula Resection in the Treatment of Anal Fistula Patients. Chinese Scientific Journal Database (Full-text Edition) Medicine and Health, 2021(2): 102.
Peng C, 2023, Evaluation of the Application Value of Reduced Suture Method in the Surgical Treatment of Anal Fistula. Chinese Sci-Tech Periodical Database Medicine, 2023(9): 86–89.
Han Z, Kang Y, Wang Q, et al., 2023, Application Value of Transrectal Biplane Ultrasound in the Surgical Treatment of Anal Fistula. Imaging Research and Medical Applications, 7(21): 158–160.
Xiao Q, Wu Y, Zhang L, et al., 2021, Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Trans-Sphincteric Fistula Ligation and Traditional Anal Fistula Surgery in the Treatment of Low Simple Anal Fistula. Clinical Research in Traditional Chinese Medicine, 13(33): 125–128.
Wang S, Wang D, Chen H, et al., 2021, The Influence of High Anal Fistula Surgical Method Selection Combined with Incision Management on Patient Prognosis. Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases, 28(5): 84–87.