Supplier selection in a mass customization environment is a systematic engineering, and Quality Function Deployment (QFD) based on customer demand is a systematic product development method. This paper studies the adaptability of the QFD method and supplier selection process in a mass customization environment and puts forward a supplier selection framework based on the QFD idea. Furthermore, both the objective environment of demand factor analysis and the thinking of the customer representatives participating in the analysis have great uncertainty and fuzziness. Therefore, a demand factor analysis method for supplier selection in the mass customization environment based on language phrases of different granularity is proposed. The proposed method allows the customer representatives participating in the selection to use their preferred language phrase set to represent the importance of demand factors. Finally, the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method are verified by an example of a vehicle manufacturer.
Cheng J, Wang JC, 2024, Exploring the Feasibility of Advanced Manufacturing for Mass Customization of Insoles in the Context of ESG. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 11(3): 815–832.
Wang H, Xin YJ, Deveci M, et al., 2024, Leveraging Online Reviews and Expert Opinions for Electric Vehicle Type Prioritization. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 197(11): 110579.
Liu P, Khan Q, Ullah HZ, 2024, A Novel MAGDM Technique Based on Q-rung Orthopair Fuzzy Aczel-Alsina Power Heronian Mean for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Organ Transplantation Networks for Healthcare Devices. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 26(1): 121–153.
Wang ZQ, Chen ZS, Garg H, et al., 2022, An Integrated Quality-Function-Deployment and Stochastic-Dominance-Based Decision-Making Approach for Prioritizing Product Concept Alternatives. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 8(3): 2541–2556.
Chen ZS, Zhu Z, Wang XJ, et al., 2023, Multiobjective Optimization-Based Collective Opinion Generation with Fairness Concern. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(9): 5729–5741.