Influence of Carbon Content on Element Diffusion in Silicon Carbide-Based TRISO Composite Fuel
Download PDF
$currentUrl="http://$_SERVER[HTTP_HOST]$_SERVER[REQUEST_URI]"

Keywords

Silicon carbide
TRISO
Composite fuel
Diffusion behavior
Carbon content

DOI

10.26689/jera.v8i5.8236

Submitted : 2024-09-15
Accepted : 2024-09-30
Published : 2024-10-15

Abstract

The coating layers of Tri-structural Isotropic Particles (TRISO) serve to protect the kernel and act as barriers to fission products. Sintering aids in the silicon carbide matrix variably react with TRISO coating layers, leading to the destruction of the coating layers. Investigating how carbon content affects element diffusion in silicon carbide-based TRISO composite fuel is of great significance for predicting reactor safety. In this study, silicon carbide-based TRISO composite fuels with different carbon contents were prepared by adding varying amounts of phenolic resin to the silicon carbide matrix. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) were employed to characterize the phase composition, morphology, and microstructure of the composite fuels. The elemental content in each coating layer of TRISO was quantified using Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS). The results demonstrated that the addition of phenolic resin promoted the uniform distribution of sintering aids in the silicon carbide matrix. The atomic percentage (at.%) of aluminum (Al) in the pyrolytic carbon layer of the TRISO particles reached its lowest value of 0.55% when the phenolic resin addition was 1%. This is because the addition of phenolic resin caused the Al and silicon (Si) in the matrix to preferentially react with the carbon in the phenolic resin to form a metastable liquid phase, rather than preferentially consuming the pyrolytic carbon in the outer coating layer of the TRISO particles. The findings suggest that carbon addition through phenolic resin incorporation can effectively mitigate the deleterious reactions between the TRISO coating layers and sintering aids, thereby enhancing the durability and safety of silicon carbide-based TRISO composite fuels.

References

Zhao Y, Xiao Z, Zhang S, 2023, Overview of Foreign Advanced Reactor Fuel Development. Foreign Nuclear News, 2023(08): 28–31.

Devi KVV, Dubey JN, Gupta J, et al., 2019, TRISO Fuel Volume Fraction and Homogeneity: A Nondestructive Characterization. Nuclear Energy Science and Engineering, 30(3): 7.

Qin X, Li M, Liao H, et al., 2020, Neutronics Analysis of Commercial Pressurized Water Reactor Loaded with FCM Fuel. Nuclear Techniques, 43(8): 080007.

Gerczak TJ, Hunn JD, Lowden RA, et al., 2016, SiC Layer Microstructure in AGR-1 and AGR-2 TRISO Fuel Particles and the Influence of its Variation on the Effective Diffusion of Key Fission Products. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 480: 257–270.

Powers JJ, Wirth BD, 2010, A Review of TRISO Fuel Performance Models. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 405(1): 74–82.

Cho YJ, Lu K, 2021, Water Vapor Oxidation of SiC Layer in Surrogate TRISO Fuel Particles. Composites Part B: Engineering, 215: 108807.

Petti D, 2005, An Overview of the DOE Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program. Presented at the Workshop on Advanced Reactors with Innovation Fuels (ARWIF), Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

Terrani KA, Kiggans JO, Silva CM, et al., 2015, Progress on Matrix SiC Processing and Properties for Fully Ceramic Microencapsulated Fuel Form. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 457: 9–17.

Katoh Y, Kohyama A, Nozawa T, et al., 2004, SiC/SiC Composites Through Transient Eutectic-Phase Route for Fusion Applications. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 329: 587–591.

Wu GH, Su J, Gou HS, et al., 2009, Study on Graphite Fiber and Ti Particle Reinforced Al Composite. Journal of Materials Science, 44(18): 4776–4780.

Kim YW, Ando K, Chu MC, 2003, Crack-Healing Behavior of Liquid-Phase-Sintered Silicon Carbide Ceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 86(3): 465–470.

Kim YW, Lee SG, Mitomo M, et al.,2002, Microstructural Development of Liquid-Phase-Sintered Silicon Carbide during Annealing with Uniaxial Pressure. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 22(7): 1031–1037.

Mahdi K, Omid Y, Alipour SA, et al., 2018, Investigation of the Effect of Al2O–Y2O3–CaO (AYC) Additives on Sinterability, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of SiC Matrix Composites: A Review. International Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials, 2018: S0263436818304499.

Song MH, Wu GH, Yang WS, et al., 2010, Mechanical Properties of Cf/Mg Composites Fabricated by Pressure Infiltration Method. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 26(10): 931–935.

Lihrmann JM, 2008, Thermodynamics of the Al2O3–Al4C3 System III. Equilibrium Vapour Pressures and Activation Energies for Volatilisation. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 28(3): 649–656.

German RM, Suri P, Park SJ, 2009, Review: Liquid Phase Sintering. Journal of Materials Science, 44(1): 1–39.

Perevislov SN, 2013, Mechanism of Liquid-Phase Sintering of Silicon Carbide and Nitride with Oxide Activating Additives. Glass and Ceramics, 70(7): 265–268.

Biswa K, Rixecker G, Aldinger F, 2005, Gas Pressure Sintering of SiC Sintered with Rare-Earth-(III)-Oxides and Their Mechanical Properties. Ceramics International, 31(5): 703–711.

Viala JC, Fortier P, Bouix J, 1990, Stable and Metastable Phase Equilibria in the Chemical Interaction Between Aluminium and Silicon Carbide. Journal of Materials Science, 25(3): 1842–1850.

Viala JC, Bosselet F, Laurent V, et al., 1993, Mechanism and Kinetics of the Chemical Interaction Between Liquid Aluminium and Silicon-Carbide Single Crystals. Journal of Materials Science, 28(19): 5301–5312.