Crossing the Achilles Heel of Algorithms: Identifying the Developmental Dilemma of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Judicial Decision-Making
Download PDF


Artificial intelligence
Automated decision-making
Algorithmic law system
Due process
Algorithmic justice



Submitted : 2023-12-24
Accepted : 2024-01-08
Published : 2024-01-23


In the developmental dilemma of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted judicial decision-making, the technicalarchitecture of AI determines its inherent lack of transparency and interpretability, which is challenging to fundamentallyimprove. This can be considered a true challenge in the realm of AI-assisted judicial decision-making. By examining thecourt’s acceptance, integration, and trade-offs of AI technology embedded in the judicial field, the exploration of potentialconflicts, interactions, and even mutual shaping between the two will not only reshape their conceptual connotations andintellectual boundaries but also strengthen the cognition and re-interpretation of the basic principles and core values of thejudicial trial system.


Liu H-W, Lin C-F, Chen Y-J, 2019, Beyond State v. Loomis: Artificial Intelligence, Government Algorithmization, and Accountability. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 27(2): 122–141.

Kroll JA, Huey J, Barocas S, et al., 2017, Accountable Algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3): 633–705.

Contini F, 2020, Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings. Law, Technology and Humans, 2(1): 4-18.

Schönberger D, 2019, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Critical Analysis of the Legal and Ethical Implications. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 27(2): 171–203.

McGregor L, Murray D, Ng V, 2019, International Human Rights Law as a Framework for Algorithmic Accountability. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(2): 309 – 343.

Ananny M, Crawford K, 2016, Seeing Without Knowing: Limitations of the Transparency Ideal and Its Application to Algorithmic Accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3): 973–989.

Gleicher M, 2016, A Framework for Considering Comprehensibility in Modeling. Big Data, 4(2): 75–88.