Keywords
Energy conservation and emission reduction
Green and low-carbon
Standardized
Submitted : 2025-05-07
Accepted : 2025-05-22
Published : 2025-06-06
Abstract
As an important part of climate change rules, standards are of great significance for supporting sustainable energy, energy conservation, and emission reduction to achieve green and low-carbon transformation and upgrading. Based on the double carbon strategic goal task, current situation of the development of international and domestic standardization, standardization power view of green industry development prospects of new energy, energy storage, carbon sink, carbon trading standardization practice process to study the way to solve problems and feasibility analysis, has been clear about the standard system construction in our country’s low carbon energy transition economies the position and role of the upgrade planning, It provides the important reference value for our country green and sustainable industry’s innovating development.
References
Yamanoshita M, 2019, IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Land. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, United States.
Kennedy CA, Stewart I, Facchini A, et al., 2015, Energy and Material Flows of Megacities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112(19): 5985–5990.
Han S, Zhao L, 2020, Standardization Helps Industrial Green Development. China Standardization, (7): 52–55.
Li N, Yang J, Chen J, 2021, Opportunities and Challenges of the Energy Industry under the Background of “Double Carbon.” China Land and Resources Economics, 34(12): 63–69.
Zhang J, Liu M, Lin L, et al., 2013, The Current Situation and Development Model Construction of Greenhouse Gas Management Standardization in China. China Standardization, 6: 40–44.
Shan Y, Guan D, Liu J, et al., 2017, Methodology and Applications of City Level CO2 Emission Accounts in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161: 1215–1225.
Qiu D, Sun Y, Shi Z, 1995, Energy Planning and System Analysis. Tsinghua University, Beijing.
Medhi BJ, Slim BY, Ilhan O, 2013, The Environmental Kuznets Curve: The Role of Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption and Trade Openness. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 51672.
Wang Y, 2016, Thoughts on the Road of New Energy Standardization. Standardization of Engineering Construction, (11): 6–7.
Liu Y, Zhao J, Xu Y, 2017, The Current Situation and Trend of China’s Green Industry Development. World Environment, (5): 40–43.
Shan, Y, Huang Q, Guan D, et al., 2020, China CO2 Emission Accounts 2016–2017. Scientific data, 7(1): 1–9.
Saidi K, Mbarek MB, 2016, Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy, CO2 Emissions, and Economic Growth for Nine Developed Countries: Evidence from Panel Granger Causality Tests. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 88: 364–374.
Hu J, 2022, Current Situation and Suggestions on the Construction of Power Battery Standard System. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 11(1): 313.
Shan Y, Guan D, Liu J, et al., 2017, Methodology and Applications of City Level CO2 Emission Accounts in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161: 1215–1225.
Zhang F, 2015, Standardization Promotes the Development of Beijing Forestry Carbon Trading, China.
Wang L, 2021, Analysis of the Emission Reduction Effect of China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policies. Social Science Front, (4): 251–255.
Li Z, Zhang D, Pan L, et al., 2021, The Low-carbon Transformation Path and Suggestions of China’s Energy under the “Dual Carbon” Goals. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 41(11): 905–909.
Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry, 2017, Interpretation of the “Construction Guide for the Green Manufacturing Standard System.” Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry, 37(1): 48.
Ye Y, Lin S, Han Y, et al., 2021, Thoughts on the Standardization Strategy Helping the Development of the New Energy Vehicle Industry under the “Dual Carbon” Goals. Proceedings of the 18th China Standardization Forum, (7): 357–363.
Liu H, Xu J, 2022, Challenges and Paths for China to Achieve “Carbon Neutrality” under the New Development Pattern. Journal of Yanbian University: Social Science Edition, 55(2): 82–89.