Effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Performance
Download PDF

Keywords

Transcranial alternating current stimulation
Motor performance
Motor learning
Primary motor cortex
Cerebellar hemisphere

DOI

10.26689/cnr.v2i1.6494

Submitted : 2024-02-28
Accepted : 2024-03-14
Published : 2024-03-29

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive method of brain stimulation that can modulate oscillatory brain activity in the cortical region. By applying alternating current through two electrodes attached to a subject’s head, it is possible to entrain the oscillation of the cortex directly under one electrode to a specific frequency. This study finds that applying tACS to the primary motor cortex and cerebellar hemisphere improves motor performance. The study also shows the effect of tACS on the supplementary motor cortex to modulate the maintenance and update of motor plans in a bimanual motor task. These recent findings show that individualized tACS interventions can be tailored by selecting the stimulation area and frequency depending on the subject’s performance level and exercise task. By further investigating the effects of tACS on motor performance, it is believed that tACS can be applied in rehabilitation.

References

Abd HAI, Gall C, Speck O, et al., 2015, Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on the Healthy and Diseased Brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2015(9): 391.

Antal A, Herrmann CS, 2016, Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms. Neural Plasticity, 3616807.

Helfrich RF, Knepper H, Nolte G, et al., 2014, Selective Modulation of Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity by HD-tACS Shapes Perception. PLoS Biology, 12(12): e1002031.

Helfrich RF, Schneider TR, Rach S, et al., 2014, Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation. Current Biology, 24(3): 333–339.

Muthukumaraswamy SD, 2011, Temporal Dynamics of Primary Motor Cortex Gamma Oscillation Amplitude and Piper Corticomuscular Coherence Changes during Motor Control. Experimental Brain Research, 212(4): 623–633.

Brown P, Marsden CD, 1998, What do the Basal Ganglia do? Lancet, 351(9118): 1801–1804.

Hamada Y, Miyashita E, Tanaka H, 1999, Gamma-band Oscillations in the Barrel Cortex Precede Rat’s Exploratory Whisking. Neuroscience, 88(3): 667–671.

Shibata T, Shimoyama I, Ito T, et al., 1999, Event-related Dynamics of the Gamma-band Oscillation in the Human Brain: Information Processing during a GO/NOGO Hand Movement Task. Neuroscience research, 33(3): 215–222.

Pogosyan A, Gaynor LD, Eusebio A, et al., 2009, Boosting Cortical Activity at Beta-band Frequencies Slows Movement in Humans. Current Biology, 19(19): 1637–1641.

Joundi RA, Jenkinson N, Brittain JS, et al., 2012, Driving Oscillatory Activity in the Human Cortex Enhances Motor Performance. Current Biology, 22(5): 403–407.

Moisa M, Polania R, Grueschow M, et al., 2016, Brain Network Mechanisms Underlying Motor Enhancement by Transcranial Entrainment of Gamma Oscillations. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(47): 12053–12065.

Lee KH, Williams LM, Breakspear M, et al., 2003, Synchronous Gamma Activity: A Review and Contribution to an Integrative Neuroscience Model of Schizophrenia. Brain Research Reviews, 41(1): 57–78.

Miyaguchi S, Otsuru N, Kojima S, et al., 2018, Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation with Gamma Oscillations over the Primary Motor Cortex and Cerebellar Hemisphere Improved Visuomotor Performance. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2018(12): 132.

Yamamoto J, Suh J, Takeuchi D, et al., 2014, Successful Execution of Working Memory Linked to Synchronized High-Frequency Gamma Oscillations. Cell, 157(4): 845–857.

Hagiwara K, Okamoto T, Shigeto H, et al., 2010, Oscillatory Gamma Synchronization Binds the Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Areas in Humans. NeuroImage, 51(1): 412–420.

Minc D, Machado S, Bastos HV, et al., 2010, Gamma Band Oscillations under Influence of Bromazepam during a Sensorimotor Integration Task: An EEG Coherence study. Neuroscience Letters, 469(1): 145–149.

Naro A, Russo M, Leo A, et al., 2016, Cortical Connectivity Modulation Induced by Cerebellar Oscillatory Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: A Marker of Covert Cognition? Clinical Neurophysiology, 127(3): 1845–1854.

Reinhart RMG, 2017, Disruption and Rescue of Interareal Theta Phase Coupling and Adaptive Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(43): 11542–11547.

Nguyen J, Deng Y, Reinhart RMG, 2018, Brain-state Determines Learning Improvements after Transcranial Alternating-Current Stimulation to Frontal Cortex. Brain stimulation, 11(4): 723–726.

Saturnino GB, Madsen KH, Siebner HR, et al., 2017, How to Target Inter-Regional Phase Synchronization with Dual-Site Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation. NeuroImage, 2017(163): 68–80.

Miyaguchi S, Otsuru N, Kojima S, et al., 2018, Gamma tACS over M1 and Cerebellar Hemisphere Improves Motor Performance in a Phase-Specific Manner. Neuroscience Letters, 2018(694), 64–68.

Naro A, Bramanti A, Leo A, et al., 2017, Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Excitability and Motor Function. Brain Structure and Function, 222(6): 2891–2906.

Polania R, Nitsche MA, Korman C, et al., 2012, The Importance of Timing in Segregated Theta Phase-Coupling for Cognitive Performance. Current Biology, 22(14): 1314–1318.

Cancelli A, Cottone C, Zito G, et al., 2015, Cortical Inhibition and Excitation by Bilateral Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 33(2): 105–114.

Moliadze V, Atalay D, Antal A, et al., 2012, Close to Threshold Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Preferentially Activates Inhibitory Networks before Switching to Excitation with Higher Intensities. Brain Stimulation, 5(4): 505–511.

Miyaguchi S, Otsuru N, Kojima S, et al., 2019, The Effect of Gamma tACS over the M1 Region and Cerebellar Hemisphere does not Depend on Current Intensity. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2019(65): 54–58.

Ito M, 2000, Mechanisms of Motor Learning in the Cerebellum. Brain Research, 886(1–2): 237–245.

Fischer S, Nitschke MF, Melchert UH, et al., 2005, Motor Memory Consolidation in Sleep Shapes More Effective Neuronal Representations. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(49): 11248–11255.

Jackson AK, Albuquerque1 LL, Pantovic1 M, et al., 2019, Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Motor Learning in a Complex Overhand Throwing Task. Cerebellum, 18(4): 813–816.

Miyaguchi S, Inukai Y, Matsumoto Y, et al., 2020, Effects on Motor Learning of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Applied over the Primary Motor Cortex and Cerebellar Hemisphere. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2020(78): 296–300.

Tecchio F, Zappasodi F, Porcaro C, et al., 2008, High-gamma Band Activity of Primary Hand Cortical Areas: A Sensorimotor Feedback Efficiency Index. NeuroImage, 40(1): 256–264.

Popa D, Spolidoro M, Proville DR, et al., 2013, Functional Role of the Cerebellum in Gamma-Band Synchronization of the Sensory and Motor Cortices. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(15): 6552–6556.

Toyokura M, Muro I, Komiya T, et al., 2002, Activation of Pre-Supplementary Motor Area (SMA) and SMA Proper during Unimanual and Bimanual Complex Sequences: An Analysis Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Neuroimaging, 12(2): 172–178.

Hosaka R, Nakajima T, Aihara K, et al., 2016, The Suppression of Beta Oscillations in the Primate Supplementary Motor Complex Reflects a Volatile State during the Updating of Action Sequences. Cerebral Cortex, 26(8): 3442–3452.

Miyaguchi S, Inukai Y, Takahashi R, et al., 2020, Effects of Stimulating the Supplementary Motor Area with a Transcranial Alternating Current for Bimanual Movement Performance. Behavioral Brain Research, 2020(393): 112801.