Body Sense: Community Building and Residents Physical Participation
Download PDF

Keywords

Embodiment
Body sense
Resident participation
Community building

DOI

10.26689/ssr.v4i6.3985

Submitted : 2022-05-21
Accepted : 2022-06-05
Published : 2022-06-20

Abstract

Community building is inseparable from the participation of the local residents. Participation pre-supposes the existence of the body, however, the existing research on residents’ willingness to participate in the community building, mostly focused on the residents’ mind, and ignored the residents’ body, showing a kind situation of “being without physically present”. This paper attempts to analyze the subjectivity of the body in the practice of community building. The article demonstrated, that resident participation is not only a single active process of consciousness, but it is also a process of embodied experience. The body is the medium through which the individual is related to the external community intentions. The body senses will perceive, and received environmental information such as sensory stimulation, situational atmosphere, and presented as the real need of the subject. The body is an important aspect, however, rarely discusses, therefore, the body sense should not be ignored during community builders.

References

Wu X, 2015, How Does Taiwanese Academics Study Urban Community Governance? Chinese Administration, 2015(8): 100-105.

Wang X, Feng T, 2004, City Residents’ Willingness to Participate in the Community: An Analysis of a Questionnaire Survey in H City. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 2004(4): 99-105.

Ma X, 2004, Resident Participation in Community Governance Framework: A Reflective Investigation. Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute, 2004(2): 59-67.

Chen W, 2004, Research on the Micro Mechanism of “Community Participation”. Academic Research, 2004(4): 77-81.

Hu R, 2006, Social Capital and Regional Independent Participation of Chinese Rural Residents: An Analysis of Factors Affecting Villagers’ Participation in Village Elections. Sociological Research, 2006(2): 61-85+244.

Yang R, 2002, On Residents’ Participation in Community Construction. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2002(2): 41-44+78.

Yang M, 2007, Communities as National Governance Units: A Case Study on Residents’ Community Participation and Community Cognition in the Process of Urban Community Construction. Sociological Research, 2007(4): 137-164+ 245.

Yu S, 2015, The Turn of Body Sense. National Taiwan University Press Center.

Wang M, Chen Y, 2004, The Body Turn. Foreign Literature, 2004(1): 36-44.

Zheng Y, 2019, Study on “Body Sense” from the Perspective of Anthropology: Viewpoint and Context. Guangxi Ethnic Studies, 2019(4): 57-65.

Zhang L, 2015, Sensory Ethnography: Theory, Practice and Representation. Ethnic Studies, 2015(2): 55-67+124-125.

Li F, 2014, Body and Inheritance: Paradigm Transformation of Intangible Cultural Heritage Research. Ideological Front, 2014(6): 110-116.

Ye H, Zhang F, 2015, Moral Judgment from an Embodied Perspective. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015(8): 1480-1488.

Shen Y, 2020, “Dirty” And “Worthless”: A Study on the Body Sense of the Elderly in Nursing Homes. Folk Culture Forum, 2020(04): 17-25.

Ye H, 2014, Theoretical Analysis of the Meaning of “Embodied”. Acta Psychology, 2014(7): 1032-1042.

Ye H, 2015, Body and Learning: Embodied Cognition and its Challenge to the Traditional View of Education. Education Research, 2015(4): 104 - 114.

Li H, Huang H, 2006, The Cognitive View of “Second Generation Cognitive Science.” Philosophical Research, 2006(6): 92-99.

Wang Y, 2012, The Gender Construction of the Hui Nationality Reflected by “Body Habits”: Based on an Ethnological Survey of the Hui Inhabited Areas in Bafang, Linxia, Gansu Province. Doctoral Dissertation of Minzu University of China.

Li H, Sheng X, 2006, The Embodiment of Cognition. Scientific Research, 2006(2): 184-190.

Song Y, 2013, Exploration of Body Connotation in Teacher-Student Relationship: Rethinking of Merleau-Ponty’s Body-Subject Theory. Contemporary Education Theory and Practice, 2013(6): 34-36.